Artifical Intelligence
To create a.i. which is useful to us in advanced social setting, one must consider first the intelligence model and that of the natural mind in this case. It's common to consider in Science these days that the brain formulates thoughts with the mind and this happens in the brain. I propose that the mind doesn't exist in the brain rather as the Internet between brains with electro-magnetic facilitation by the frontal lobes magnetite. Also the brain partly receives thoughts and translates the frequencies as it were, it doesn't create them from just chemicals, chemicals merely fuels it's capacity.
Consider that emotions are based at large on innate intellectual understanding and by perceptive reasoning. What's called emotional intelligence these days is in fact determined by the concerted accumulative response mechanisms in place on a instinctual foundation. These are a experienced based growth method of the mind in time space not a independently valuable practice. Intelligence itself is made partly of this and partly of deliberate constructive deductions based foremost on probability and amoung others secondarily in a exponential change algorithm on emotional intelligence alone.
A.I. can do things in the practical world like fix a broken dish on the space station or even build a Opera House, but can it forge a deliberate original course? Innovation, scientific development, these are based wholly on accidentally acquired measures to solve inherent problems of disorder or demands. We call it more or less intelligent if it or they conspire in creation of a perfected solution producing awe and wonder. So then what makes a superior artifical intelligence the best? It would need power to solve near infinite problems within a set of near infinite problems, then contain a measure of good judgment to create class of deeds in predicted stability, a profit by absolute measure. Without such it's not intelligent because it's got nothing to do to show itself as so after fixing everything that's broken and having ensured it doesn't break again.
Bringing us back to Emotion, this is resulting in the acceptable tolerance of time space without intelligent potential due to incapacitating factors. 'I have emotional response because the intelligent reaction to circumstances created it so and or nullification of conditions for re-assimilated foundation is determined intellectually unwise or impossible'. Essentially it's a factor of the circumstance fixated by conditions, afforded by intention of participatory parties and at weight and measure of the individual, whose relative value is predetermined by current chemical enrichment.
Consider that emotions are based at large on innate intellectual understanding and by perceptive reasoning. What's called emotional intelligence these days is in fact determined by the concerted accumulative response mechanisms in place on a instinctual foundation. These are a experienced based growth method of the mind in time space not a independently valuable practice. Intelligence itself is made partly of this and partly of deliberate constructive deductions based foremost on probability and amoung others secondarily in a exponential change algorithm on emotional intelligence alone.
A.I. can do things in the practical world like fix a broken dish on the space station or even build a Opera House, but can it forge a deliberate original course? Innovation, scientific development, these are based wholly on accidentally acquired measures to solve inherent problems of disorder or demands. We call it more or less intelligent if it or they conspire in creation of a perfected solution producing awe and wonder. So then what makes a superior artifical intelligence the best? It would need power to solve near infinite problems within a set of near infinite problems, then contain a measure of good judgment to create class of deeds in predicted stability, a profit by absolute measure. Without such it's not intelligent because it's got nothing to do to show itself as so after fixing everything that's broken and having ensured it doesn't break again.
Bringing us back to Emotion, this is resulting in the acceptable tolerance of time space without intelligent potential due to incapacitating factors. 'I have emotional response because the intelligent reaction to circumstances created it so and or nullification of conditions for re-assimilated foundation is determined intellectually unwise or impossible'. Essentially it's a factor of the circumstance fixated by conditions, afforded by intention of participatory parties and at weight and measure of the individual, whose relative value is predetermined by current chemical enrichment.
The macro-scale and micro-scale is the primarily valuable comparative measure, and how the apparent universe conditions the objects and subjects in the case is juxtaposed against how they have in prior time and will do so. Thus due in appreciated consideration is a rank by all measures and directive for equality margins or instruction for factoral superseedance.
In context, perhaps when in modern instance the Software update on one's Smarts Phone takes more time and money to do than the things value retains, you would find the reversal typical in social change and redirection(the fitting analogy in this article on my ever slightly decadent Note2) Of course were it change in time to be predictable to a infinite measure we wouldn't have understanding of intelligence only emotions in which we could trust 100% to guarantee we won't get hurt or suffer somehow.
In context, perhaps when in modern instance the Software update on one's Smarts Phone takes more time and money to do than the things value retains, you would find the reversal typical in social change and redirection(the fitting analogy in this article on my ever slightly decadent Note2) Of course were it change in time to be predictable to a infinite measure we wouldn't have understanding of intelligence only emotions in which we could trust 100% to guarantee we won't get hurt or suffer somehow.
Where then is the measured appreciation of infinite change with calculated reactionary response determinations for safety and security? It's in preprogrammed logic systems with a 99.99999999% guarantee rate. Indeed the creators be it Google or a hacker revelled on Z-berg stations newest Civilisation V equivalent, will safe-guard the 0.000000001% chance with their lives, for the Sextrillion dollar empire built around it is happening to rest on their shoulders. While apparent random entropic incursion continues to stifle utopia through odd-ball rapes, murders, revolutions, and war.
Hold your horses reader; there is a better way.
Comments
Post a Comment